Director Lee Chang Hee of the Netflix series 'A Killer Paradox' has attempted to clarify the inclusion of certain sexual scenes, but criticism continues to linger.
'A Killer Paradox', released on February 9 KST, delves into the tale of an average man who inadvertently becomes a killer and the detective hot on his trail.
Based on the well-received original webtoon for its innovative concepts and composition, 'A Killer Paradox' has garnered acclaim for its distinct and contemporary direction, as well as the impassioned performances of its cast. However, certain scenes have drawn ire for their gratuitous nature.
Among the most criticized aspects are the unnecessary sexual scenes and nudity. A particular scene involving Lee Tang (portrayed by Choi Woo Sik) indulging in an affair was deemed gratuitous, especially with the depiction of a victim of illegal filming.
Despite attempts to justify the choices, such as Director Lee Chang Hee's explanation that the love scene aims to delve into the morality of the character Lee Tang, questions persist. Some argue that such explicit depictions detract from the authenticity of the narrative, questioning the necessity of showcasing nudity.
While Director Lee Chang Hee has invested in enhancing realism, such as utilizing CGI for a child actor's face, the decision to include explicit scenes raises questions about artistic integrity.
Furthermore, the decision to include footage of the victim of illegal filming has sparked controversy. Critics argue that perpetuating the victim's pain throughout the series feels exploitative and detracts from the overall viewing experience.
Despite its initial success, with 'A Killer Paradox' amassing over 3.1 million views within three days of release and charting in the Netflix Global Top 10 Non-English TV category, the lingering criticism over certain scenes leaves a bitter taste for some viewers.
It’s not just this drama Netflix has been putting unnecessary sex scenes in lots their shows and movies. It’s been talked about for awhile now. Most of it is just thrown at viewers unexpectedly.
2 more replies