It is reported that evidence has emerged suggesting that Min Hee Jin, the CEO of ADOR, attempted to exploit the parents of NewJeans members even before the commencement of HYBE's audit.

On May 21 KST it was reported that , CEO Min Hee Jin had a conversation with the head of the ADOR unit, a day before the parents of NewJeans members sent a letter of complaint on March 30 KST.

During the conversation, CEO Min Hee Jin expressed intentions to actively utilize the parents of NewJeans members, as long as it does not violate the shareholder agreement, stating, "Is this written from the moms' perspectives? We should consider the tone of delivery," and suggesting, "We can actively exploit the fact that moms did not sign contracts with HYBE. Are there any clauses worth objecting to?"

Furthermore, on April 20, two days before HYBE initiated an audit of ADOR, there were plans to attack the parent company, HYBE. It was said, "The moms will be the ones filing complaints with the Fair Trade Commission. It wouldn't look right for the subsidiary to file a complaint. It's better if the moms criticize. The fact that moms filed a complaint alone will prove innocence. If the subsidiary company complains, there can be accusations of harming the company."

Earlier, during the hearing for the injunction against the exercise of voting rights filed by CEO Min Hee Jin against HYBE on May 17 KST, HYBE argued, "CEO Min Hee Jin instructed that if she or ADOR raised issues, it would constitute a violation of the shareholder agreement, so the parents of NewJeans members must express their dissatisfaction first. She only used NewJeans and their parents for her own goals."

In response, CEO Min Hee Jin's side refuted, "It is not true that the NewJeans parents followed CEO Min's instructions. They were urged to express their anger at HYBE's wrongdoing and voluntarily wrote the letter of complaint to ADOR."

SEE ALSO: Former ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin files a lawsuit against BELIFT LAB for defamation, seeking .57 million in damages.