Does anyone else feel, or is it just me, that ILLIT's recent debut strikes a familiar chord reminiscent of NewJeans' debut? From the youthful and subtly shy girl concept to the sleek, straight all-black hair, the parallels are striking.
The styling choices for ILLIT also seem to draw heavily from the aesthetics that defined NewJeans during their debut era, creating an undeniable resemblance between the two groups' introductory looks. This similarity extends not just to their visual presentation but also hints at a broader trend in the styling choices emerging within the industry.
However, the similarities don't stop at visuals and concepts; even their debut songs share an eerily similar vibe. NewJeans marked their entrance with an explosive debut, arguably one of the most successful the K-Pop industry has witnessed in recent years. Their arrival introduced a refreshing dynamism in a fiercely competitive arena. The promotional strategy, innovative concepts, and distinctive approach to their debut set them apart, offering something truly unique that hadn't been widely observed in the industry. This novel approach not only made them stand out but also raised the bar for originality and creativity in K-Pop debuts.
Yet, with ILLIT's introduction to the scene, it appears that HYBE is revisiting a previously successful concept. Given the initial acclaim and positive reception, it's understandable why they might lean towards replicating a similar formula. However, this approach has stripped the debut of its novelty. What was once groundbreaking now feels overly familiar, and perhaps the anticipation surrounding their launch was more amplified than warranted, diminishing the impact of what could have been a unique and special debut in its own right.
Indeed, the track "Magnetic" lives up to its name with a captivating beat that easily draws listeners into singing along almost instantly. However, its charm doesn't mask the lack of uniqueness and it's something we've heard before. This repetition begs the question: Is HYBE setting a precedent for its future by consistently aiming to debut groups with concepts closely mirroring those of existing acts within their roster? The trend suggests a strategic choice, but it also sparks debate about the balance between successful formulas and the need for innovation.
HYBE's meteoric rise within the ranks can be attributed to its departure from the conventional norms of the K-Pop industry. Whether it was through their unique promotional tactics, innovative music video concepts, or unexpected collaborations, HYBE consistently infused an element of surprise and anticipation in their projects. Fans and industry watchers were always keen to see how HYBE would defy expectations next, creating a constant buzz of excitement around what they would introduce to the global music scene. This pioneering spirit not only set them apart but also cemented their reputation as trailblazers in the industry.
Admittedly, the world of K-Pop is vast, yet there are finite styles and concepts that a group can adopt, making originality challenging. HYBE is not the first company to revisit and recycle concepts, as many entertainment companies tend to have a signature style or theme that defines their groups. This practice of recycling concepts is not uncommon in the industry, where certain aesthetics, sounds, and themes become synonymous with specific labels.
However, for a company like HYBE, known for its innovation and breaking the mold, resorting to familiar concepts seems somewhat unexpected. This shift begs a broader discussion on the balance between innovation and following proven successes in the entertainment industry. It also opens up a conversation about the expectations placed on companies like HYBE to continually innovate in a market that is both saturated and highly competitive.
I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this. Do you think HYBE is taking a step back by adopting more familiar concepts, or is this simply a strategic move to ensure success in a competitive industry? How do you view the balance between innovation and tradition in the world of K-Pop?
Let's not dwell on this topic for an entire year, please. It seems some are quick to label Illit as a copy of NWJS just because of similarities like long black hair, 5 members (originally 6), and strong visuals. While comparisons are natural, musically, I don't detect any significant similarities. Illit's music encompasses dreamcore, pluggnb, and a hint of lo-fi, while NWJS leans towards an early 00s hip, groovy, 2-step sound. The only legit parallel I notice is their eclectic fashion sense, with Illit embracing a more trendy, coquette style. Let's appreciate each group for their unique qualities and creativity.....
2 more replies