Allkpop has recently posted about the same article I am going to talk about. However it was rather a
the focus of my post based on this article would be
[However, the SBS entertainment reporter who first reported about Seungri questioned, "The person involved in the raised suspicions of prostitutions isn't a woman but rather a man. There is a part that can be sufficiently inferred from the conversations. It's hard to say that I wrote this story simply because of a slip of tongue]
Kang is very adamant her allegations against Seungri is true but as of today, this is the third time Kang changed her fact regarding the investor mentioned in the initial edited KakaoTalk chats she posted on February.
So, either Kang actually meant there are more than one foreign investors involved but that can be refuted as she herself clarified this time, the person involved in this prostitution suspicion isn't a woman but a man. From this we know she is only talking about a specific investor and not multiple of them.
Until today, Kang never really did explain why she omitted singer C out of her initial edited KakaoTalk chats she published. Some speculate singer C might be the whistleblower but like many, it remains as speculations, not a fact.
PS: please don't delete this Allkpop. need I remind you your post on TOP's update was false because you used pictures of him from 2014 but still have not delete the post? so yes, please don't delete this.
This is why it was shady of her to edit the chats in the first place. Sounds like she was trying to make the chat match the narrative she was trying to sell. Now it's all muddy and nobody knows what's really going on. Not saying SR is an innocent angel, but still waiting for concrete evidence that he did something illegal. Life as a celebrity is messed up. Instead of innocent until proven guilty, he's guilty until proven innocent.
8 more replies